Control of 11 Schools Seized Response.
Greetings,
I have just finished reading this article from the Washington Post. It basically reports that the Maryland Board of Education has decided to put several public schools, which are consistently underperforming, in the hands of private contractors and charter schools. The plan is that the private contractors and charter schools will be better trained and motivated to improve the schools and thus put them on track to pass the NCLB deadline.
I am not sure how I feel on this issue. On the onset it appears to be a logical plan, if the current administration doesn’t do the job properly, get new administration. However, I am not sure how the private contractors will fare relative to the old administration, or even why this type of step is taken.
It seems to me that another logical plan of action would have been to hire new administrators in those public schools. Although I do not know if they have done this, the article seems to give hints that this has not. From this, I am forced to think of a reason why the BOE has decided to take a large step, such as this, so early. The only one I can think of at the moment is Politics. They could be trying to say “Hey, look at us, we are really trying to get our schools on track, we are special.” This would be a huge vote-getter if someone on the BOE wanted to run for office.
Website:
Anderson, Nick. “Control of 11 Schools Seized.” Washington Post. 30 March 2006.
April 9th, 2006 at 4:21 pm
Christopher Bauer Comment…
I agree with Christopher Baure’s lack of confidence in the move by the Maryland Board of Education to replace 11 school administrations with private contractors. The move is a direct effect of the problems associated with the No Child Left Behind a…